<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Using JRuby for Java testing?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.technoetic.com/2008/01/09/using-jruby-for-java-testing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.technoetic.com/2008/01/09/using-jruby-for-java-testing/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 04:59:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan Light</title>
		<link>http://blog.technoetic.com/2008/01/09/using-jruby-for-java-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-22133</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan Light</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 14:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technoetic.com/2008/01/09/using-jruby-for-java-testing/#comment-22133</guid>
		<description>@paul: With regard to Groovy =~ Ruby and Ruby =~ Groovy, not so.  Groovy&#039;s metaprogramming API is big on ceremony whereas Ruby&#039;s is simple yet immensely powerful.  IMO, Ruby&#039;s pure-OO nature and metaprogramming capabilities are what set it apart from other languages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@paul: With regard to Groovy =~ Ruby and Ruby =~ Groovy, not so.  Groovy&#8217;s metaprogramming API is big on ceremony whereas Ruby&#8217;s is simple yet immensely powerful.  IMO, Ruby&#8217;s pure-OO nature and metaprogramming capabilities are what set it apart from other languages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Davis</title>
		<link>http://blog.technoetic.com/2008/01/09/using-jruby-for-java-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-12899</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 18:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.technoetic.com/2008/01/09/using-jruby-for-java-testing/#comment-12899</guid>
		<description>Really, they are both great for unit testing java. Often, the setup code for jUnit is bigger (more verbose) than the actual tests being performed.

To offer comparisons, Groovy may be easier (for someone learning a new language) just because it is so close to java and is backwards compatible with it.

On the ruby side, beyond simple unit testing, RSpec is an elegant way to write behavior tests. Probably more elegant than any of the other ways to do it.

Groovy and Ruby are so similar that it&#039;s hard to try to position one above the other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really, they are both great for unit testing java. Often, the setup code for jUnit is bigger (more verbose) than the actual tests being performed.</p>
<p>To offer comparisons, Groovy may be easier (for someone learning a new language) just because it is so close to java and is backwards compatible with it.</p>
<p>On the ruby side, beyond simple unit testing, RSpec is an elegant way to write behavior tests. Probably more elegant than any of the other ways to do it.</p>
<p>Groovy and Ruby are so similar that it&#8217;s hard to try to position one above the other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

