<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: XPlanner article in JavaWorld</title>
	<link>http://blog.technoetic.com/2005/08/21/xplanner-article-in-javaworld/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Dmitry</title>
		<link>http://blog.technoetic.com/2005/08/21/xplanner-article-in-javaworld/#comment-275</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 08:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.technoetic.com/2005/08/21/xplanner-article-in-javaworld/#comment-275</guid>
					<description>today morning I have the same intention: to re-implement XPlanner on ROR with db compatibility preserved. May I participate in porting?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>today morning I have the same intention: to re-implement XPlanner on ROR with db compatibility preserved. May I participate in porting?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jacques Morel</title>
		<link>http://blog.technoetic.com/2005/08/21/xplanner-article-in-javaworld/#comment-71</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2005 03:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.technoetic.com/2005/08/21/xplanner-article-in-javaworld/#comment-71</guid>
					<description>I put some of my thoughts on a rewrite in http://docs.codehaus.org/display/XPR/Ruby+on+Rails+rewrite.
Please feel free to add your thoughts if you are thinking about a rewrite seriously. I am not sure my company would like it (and contribute what it is contributing now) but I definitively would. 

Jacques</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I put some of my thoughts on a rewrite in <a href='http://docs.codehaus.org/display/XPR/Ruby+on+Rails+rewrite' rel='nofollow'>http://docs.codehaus.org/display/XPR/Ruby+on+Rails+rewrite</a>.<br />
Please feel free to add your thoughts if you are thinking about a rewrite seriously. I am not sure my company would like it (and contribute what it is contributing now) but I definitively would. </p>
<p>Jacques
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
